| Adenomyosis DOWNLOAD FACT SHEET IN PDF References: 1) Tamai K, Togasho K, Ito T. MR Imaging Findings of Adenomyosis: Correlation with Histopathologic Features and Diagnositic Pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:21-40 [PDF] 2) Schneider SL, Craig M, Branning P. Improved Sonographic Accuracy in the Presurgical Diagnosis of Diffuse Adenomyosis: A Case Series and Review. JDMS 2002;18:71-77 [PDF] 3) Verma SK, Lev-Toaff AS, Baltarowich OH. Adenomyosis: Sonohysterography with MRI Correlation. AJR 2009;192:1112-1116 [PDF] 4) Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM. Diffuse Adenomyosis: Comparison of Endovaginal US and MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151-158 [PDF] 5) Simpson WL, Beitia LG, Mester J. Hysterosalpingography: A Reemerging Study. Radiographics 2006;26:419-431 [PDF] 6) Chopra S, Lev-Toaff AS, Ors F. Adenomyosis: Common and Uncommon Manifestations on Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:617-627 [PDF] 7) Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR. Adenomyosis: US Features with Histologic Correlation in an in Vitro Study. Radiology 2000;215:783-790 [PDF] 8) Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A. Uterine Adenomyosis: Endovaginal US and MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:S147-S160 [PDF] 9) Byun JY, Kim SE, Choi BG. Diffuse and Focal Adenomyosis: MR Imaging Findings. Radiographics 1999;19:S161-S17 [PDF] |