| FDG PET of the Breasts DOWNLOAD FACT SHEET IN PDF References: 1) Rosenbaum SJ, Lind T, Antoch G. False-Positive FDG PET Uptake – the Role of PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1054-1065 [PDF] 2) Shammas A, Lim R, Charron M. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: Physiologic Uptake, Normal Variants, and Benign Conditions. Radiographics 2009;29:1467-1486 [PDF] 3) Vranjesevic D, Schiepers C, Silverman DH. Relationship Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Breast Density in Women with Normal Breast Tissue. J Nucl Med 2003;44(8):1238-1242 [PDF] 4) Kumar R, Chauhan A, Zhuang H. Standardized Uptake Values of Normal Breast Tissue with 2- Deoxy-2-[F-18]Fluoro-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomography: Variations with Age, Breast Density, and Menopausal Status. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2005;8:355-262 [PDF] 5) Lin CY, Ding HJ, Liu CS. Correlation Between the Intensity of Breast FDG Uptake and Menstrual Cycle. Acad Radiol 2007;14:940-944 [PDF] 6) Korn RL, Yost AM, May CC. Unexpected Focal Hypermetabolic Activity in the Breast: Significance in Patients Undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT. AJR 2006;187(1):81-85 [PDF] 7) Litmanovich D, Gourevich K, Israel O. Unexpected foci of 18F-FDG uptake in the breast detected by PET/CT: incidence and clinical significance. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36: 1558-1564 [PDF] 8) Kang BJ, Lee JH, Yoo LR. Clinical Significance of Incidental Finding of Focal Activity in the Breast at 18F-FDG PET/CT. AJR 2011;197(2):341-347 [PDF] 9) Hicks RJ, Binns D, Stabin MG. Pattern of Uptake and Excretion of 18F-FDG in the Lactating Breast. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1238-1242 [PDF] 10) Mavi A, Cermik TF, Urhan M. The Effect of Age, Menopausal State, and Breast Density on 18F- FDG Uptake in Normal Glandular Breast Tissue. J Nucl Med 2010;51:347-352 [PDF] 11) Chung A, Schoder H, Sampson M. Incidental Breast Lesions Identified by 18F- Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17(8):2119-2125 [PDF] 12) Adejou M, Huo L, Rohren E. False-Positive Lesions Mimicking Breast Cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. AJR 2012;198:W304-W314 [PDF] |