PET-CT Artifact Related to Contrast or Metal
DOWNLOAD FACT SHEET IN PDF

References:

1) Rosenbaum SJ, Lind T, Antoch G. False-Positive FDG PET Uptake – the Role of PET/CT. Eur
Radiol 2006;16:1054-1065
[PDF]

2) Shammas A, Lim R, Charron M. Pediatric FDG PET/CT: Physiologic Uptake, Normal Variants,
and Benign Conditions. Radiographics 2009;29:1467-1486
[PDF]

3) Blake MA, Singh A, Setty BN. Pearls and Pitfalls in Interpretation of Abdominal and Pelvic PET-
CT. Radiographics 2006;26:1335-1353
[PDF]

4) Goerres GW, von Schulthess GK, Hany TF. Positron Emission Tomography and PET CT of the
Head and Neck: FDG Uptake in Normal Anatomy, in Benign Lesions, and in Changes Resulting
from Treatment. AJR 2002;179:1337-1343
[PDF]

5) Blodgett TM, Fukui MB, Snyderman CH. Combined PET-CT in the Head and Neck: Part 1.
Physiologic, Altered Physiologic, and Artifactual FDG Uptake. Radiographics 2005;25:897-912
[PDF]

6) Kapoor V, Fukui MV, McCook BM. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Treatment of Head and Neck
Cancers: Posttherapy Evaluation and Pitfalls. AJR 2005;184:589-597
[PDF]

7) Blodgett TM, Mehta AS, Mehta AS. PET/CT artifacts. Clinical Imaging 2011;35:49-63 [PDF]

8) Cook GJR, Wegner EA, Fogelman I. Pitfalls and Artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT Oncologic
Imaging. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2004;34(2):122-133
[PDF]

9) Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT Imaging Artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol 2005;33:156-161
[PDF]

10) Cook GJR. Pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;51:235-243 [PDF]

11) Goerres GW, Ziegler SI, Burger C. Artifacts at PET and PET/CT Caused by Metallic Hip
Prosthetic Material. Radiology 2003;226:577-584
[PDF]

12) Halpern BS, Dahlbom M, Waldherr C. Cardiac Pacemakers and Central Venous Lines Can
Induce Focal Artifacts on CT-Corrected PET Images. J Nucl Med 2004;45(2):290-293
[PDF]

13) Cronin CG, Prakash P, Blake MA. Oral and IV Contrast Agents for the CT Portion of PET/CT.
AJR 2010;195:W5-W13
[PDF]

14) Mawlawi O, Erasmus JJ, Munden RF. Quantifying the Effect of IV Contrast Media on
Integrated PET/CT: Clinical Evaluation. AJR 2006;186:308-319
[PDF]

15) Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET
attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167-1175
[PDF]

16) Yau YY, Chan WS, Tam YM. Application of Intravenous Contrast in PET/CT: Does It Really
Introduce Significant Attenuation Correction Error? J Nucl Med 2005;46:283-291
[PDF]

17) Dizendorf E, Hany TF, Buck A. Cause and Magnitude of the Error Induced by Oral CT
Contrast Agent in CT-Based Attenuation Correction of PET Emission Studies. J Nucl Med 2003;
44:732-738
[PDF]

18) Nakamoto Y, Chin BB, Kraitchman DL. Effects of Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Agents at
PET/CT Imaging: Phantom and Canine Studies. Radiology 2003;227:817-824
[PDF]

19) Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Egelhof T. Focal Tracer Uptake: A Potential Artifact in Contrast-
Enhanced Dual-Modality PET/CT Scans. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1339-1342
[PDF]

20) Cohade C, Osman M, Nakamoto Y. Initial Experience with Oral Contrast in PET/CT: Phantom
and Clinical Studies. J Nucl Med 2003;44(3):412-416
[PDF]

21) Goerres GW. Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic
implants. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:367-370
[PDF]

22) Blodgett TM, Ryan A, Akbarpouranbadr A. PET/CT Protocols and Artifacts in the Head and
Neck. PET Clin 2007;2(4):433-443
[PDF]