 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Ultrasound of the Gravid Cervix [PDF] References: 1) ACR Appropriateness Criteria- Assessment of Gravid Cervix (originated in 1999, reviewed in 2008) [PDF] 2) Crane JMG, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:579-587 [PDF] 3) Crane JMG, Hutchens D. Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:640-645 [PDF] 4) Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, MeisPJ. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med1996;334:567-572 [PDF] 5) Yazici G, Yildiz A,Tiras MB. Comparison of Transperineal and Transvaginal Sonography in Predicting Preterm Delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:225-230 [PDF] 6) Kutlu TU, Gurbuz A, Yazici G. Comparison of Cervical Volume and Cervical Length to Predict Preterm Delivery by Transvaginal Ultrasound. American Journal of Perinatology 2006;23(3):167-171 [PDF] 7) Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P. Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: A review of the literature. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 2006;19(12):755-762 [PDF] 8) Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, Farrell TA. Spontaneously Changing Gravid Cervix: Clinical Implications and Prognostic Features. Radiology 1995;196:721-724 [PDF] 9) Doyle NM, Monga M. Role of ultrasound in screening patients at risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2004;31:125-139 [PDF] 10) Yost NP, Bloom SL, Twickler DM. Pitfalls in Ultrasonic Cervical Length Measurement for Predicting Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(4):510-516 [PDF] |